ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED CONSENT
ORDER TO AID PUBLIC COMMENT
The Federal Trade Commission has accepted an agreement, subject to final approval, to a
proposed consent order from New Vision International, Inc., NVI Promotions, L.L.C., and
their two principals, Jason P. Boreyko and Benson K. Boreyko (hereinafter New
Vision or respondents). New Vision is a multi-level marketing company
that sells nutritional supplements. In a separate action, the Commission has also accepted
a similar agreement involving Max F. James, a distributor of New Vision products.
The proposed consent order has been placed on the public record for sixty (60) days for
the reception of comments by interested persons. Comments received during this period will
become part of the public record. After sixty (60) days, the Commission will again review
the agreement and any comments received and will decide whether it should withdraw from
the agreement and take other appropriate action or make final the agreement's proposed
order.
This matter has focused on New Vision's advertisements for a regimen of nutritional
supplements that they called "Gods Recipe." The advertisements claimed
that Gods Recipe could mitigate or cure the effects of Attention Deficit Disorder or
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.
The proposed complaint alleges that New Vision could not substantiate the following
claims: (1) that God's Recipe can cure, prevent, treat or mitigate Attention Deficit
Disorder or its symptoms; (2) that God's Recipe can cure, prevent, treat or mitigate
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder or its symptoms; (3) that God's Recipe is an
effective alternative treatment to the prescription drug Ritalin for Attention Deficit
Disorder and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder; and (4) that testimonials from
consumers appearing in the advertisements for God's Recipe reflect the typical or ordinary
experience of members of the public whose children have used the product.
Part I of the proposed consent order prohibits New Vision, when advertising God's
Recipe or any other food, drug or dietary supplement, from making claims (1) through (3),
above, unless the claim is substantiated at the time it is made. Part II of the proposed
order addresses claims made through endorsements or testimonials. Under Part II,
respondents may make such representations if they possess and rely upon competent and
reliable evidence that substantiates the representations; or the respondents must disclose
either what the generally expected results would be for users of the advertised products,
or the limited applicability of the endorser's experience to what consumers may generally
expect to achieve. The proposed order's treatment of testimonial claims is in accordance
with the Commission's "Guides Concerning Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in
Advertising," 16 C.F.R. 255.2 (a).
Part III of the proposed order prohibits respondents from making unsubstantiated claims
about the safety of any food, drug or dietary supplement, or about the ability of such
product to treat, cure, alleviate the symptoms of, prevent, or reduce the risk of
developing any disease or disorder. Part IV of the proposed order contains language
permitting New Vision to make drug claims that have been approved by the FDA pursuant to
either a new drug application or a tentative final or final standard. Part V states that
New Vision would be permitted to make claims that the FDA has approved pursuant to the
Nutrition Labeling and Education Act of 1990.
Part VI of the proposed order requires New Vision to retain, and make available to the
Commission upon request, all advertisements and promotional materials containing any
representation covered by the order, as well as any materials that it relied upon in
disseminating the representation and any materials that contradict, qualify, or call into
question the representation.
Parts VII and VIII of the proposed order require New Vision to distribute the order to
relevant parties. Part VII requires New vision to distribute a copy of the order to all
current and future principals, officers, directors, and managers, and to any employee,
agent or representative with responsibilities under the order. Part VIII.A requires the
company to distribute a letter, attached to the order as Appendix A, to each current
active distributor. Part VIII.B requires the company to distribute a letter, attached to
the order as Appendix B, to future distributors for a period of five years. These
substantially similar letters state that no distributor may make any claim regarding the
therapeutic or curative properties of New Vision products unless she has received prior
approval from New Vision. The letters also state that all distributor advertising must
either be obtained from New Vision or pre-approved by New Vision. In addition, the letters
state that failure to conform to these requirements will be grounds for suspension or
termination.
Part IX of the proposed New Vision order contains some additional requirements in
recognition of the fact that, as a multi-level marketing company, New Vision's contact
with consumers is made almost exclusively through a network of distributors who are not
covered by the order. For example, Part IX.A.1 would require the company to compel its
distributors to submit all advertising to the company for pre-approval. Part IX.A.2 would
require New Vision to establish a mechanism for suspending or terminating business
dealings with any distributor who fails to submit advertising for pre-approval. Part
IX.A.3 would require New Vision to send to each active distributor a notice, every six
months, reminding them of the pre-approval requirement. To ensure that the company remains
abreast of its distributors' marketing efforts over the Internet, Part IX.A.4 would
require New Vision to conduct a monthly search of the World Wide Web for independent
distributor advertising.
Part IX.B of the proposed order would require New Vision to police its distributors and
investigate complaints that any distributor may be violating the order. Part IX.C would
require New Vision to discontinue dealing with any distributor once respondents obtain
actual knowledge, or knowledge fairly implied on the basis of objective circumstances,
that the distributor is making a representation that is prohibited by the order, unless
that person immediately ceases such activity. If New Vision learns that the distributor
has not permanently ceased making representations prohibited by the order, New Vision must
immediately discontinue its dealings with the distributor.
The remainder of the proposed New Vision order contains standard requirements that the
corporate respondents notify the Commission of any changes in corporate structure that
might affect compliance with the order; that the individual respondents notify the
Commission of changes in their employments status, and that New Vision file one or more
reports detailing their compliance with the order.
The purpose of this analysis is to facilitate public comment on the proposed order, and
it is not intended to constitute an official interpretation of the agreement and proposed
order, or to modify in any way their terms. |